Log in

No account? Create an account

One Cobble at a Time

Gifted programs and decisions

Sandra Tayler's Journal

responsible woman

A cobble by itself is just a small stone, but when many of them lay together they create a path . My life is made up of many discrete parts. I have to find ways to fit them all into place so that I can continue to journey where I desire to go. This journal records some of the cobbles that create my path.

Gifted programs and decisions

Previous Entry Share Next Entry
responsible woman

I have notes for three blog entries which I scribbled down over the weekend. I wrote notes for two more on Monday. It was delightful. I loved the fact that my brain was spontaneously percolating more than one blog entry at a time. That used to happen, but hasn’t for months. Then I stumbled across Tuesday. It wasn’t Tuesday’s fault really. Nothing inherent to the day was problematic. I just woke up with a sense of stress and sadness. Sometimes that happens. I tried to muddle through anyway. Then in the afternoon, Tuesday did provide new food for thought. I’ve been thinky with it ever since. Gleek was accepted to a gifted program which will require a two year commitment and a transfer to a different school.

I am a graduate of GATE (Gifted And Talented Education) a program that was run by my California school district in an effort to meet the needs of kids who learned things really quickly. Being one of the Honors kids put me with a group of peers who valued school and learning. I made great friends and had a good experience. Towards the end of high school I noticed that there were kids not in the Honors classes who were every bit as smart as I was. They just didn’t quite make the cut due to class size limitations. That was when I first questioned whether test-to-get-in gifted programs are a good thing.

I’m good at learning new things very quickly. My brain picks up information and stores it even when I’m not consciously trying to learn. Know what I’m not naturally good at? Following through. I’m happy to make a herculean effort for a project, but I frequently fail at do-a-little-every-day type tasks. In school, I was great at learning, but awful at studying. I’m told this is common to gifted people. Which is fine, so long as the word “gifted” is being used as a descriptor for a particular pattern of brain function. Instead it is often used to mean “special” “smarter” “better” and is held up like some golden prize that one must simply be born with. I think this reverence comes in part because those who think in careful steps are in awe of intuitive leaps. I am in awe of the people who know how to work steadily on a single thing until they get really good at it. That story about the tortoise and the hare is true and gifted people get to play the part of the hare.

This gifted program that Gleek may be entering, Kiki was in it six years ago. Now Kiki says it was really good for her and that she is glad she went. I have vivid memories of some very hard months. It was only after we emerged from the program that I read several articles which made clear to me the fact that whether or not a person is gifted or talented, the people who succeed are the ones who work hard. That was when I learned to praise and reward effort no matter whether the effort succeeded at what it set out to do. I’ve learned so much since Kiki was in the program. I am better prepared to handle it. Yes I do have to handle it. This is a program which expects parental support. It is a high-intensity program. For that reason I have reservations about committing to it. But then, Gleek is a high-intensity person. It is possible that this is exactly what she needs. I know for certain that the school she’s been attending isn’t right for her anymore.

In the article I linked yesterday there is a phrase “narrative in the public discussion.” One of the things I don’t like about gifted programs is the narratives which surround them. “These kids are special” is in the air. That is often followed by an admonishment to the kids that because they are gifted they have a responsibility to live up to their potential. The problem with that narrative is that it only sets a high bar without showing the kids how to reach it. If they don’t hit it on the first try, it feels hopeless to them. Instead these kids, the ones who learn by intuitive leap, need a narrative which talks about the value of work. They don’t need lofty goals, they need practice pacing themselves toward far goals. The program is structured in such way that kids can learn pacing there, but when Kiki was in it the narrative was off. Of course the only way for me to affect the public narrative on giftedness is to participate in the discussion. I can be the voice which says that we all have things to learn and it doesn’t matter how fast we learn them. Education is not a race. There is no prize for getting there first.

We will probably accept the placement for Gleek. We have a couple of weeks to decide and a few more factors to weigh, but early indicators point that way. This is yet another of those parenting decisions which I must make without knowing what all the repercussions will be.

Mirrored from onecobble.com.

  • (Anonymous)
    My son just got into what I'm assuming is the same program, although probably not the same school. Gifted programs were good for me, but I am also nervous about the time commitment, and since he's my oldest I haven't been through it yet to know what I'm getting myself into.--Emily M.
    • The Orem Gifted program (A.L.L.) is definitely a big time commitment. On the other hand, the kids get to do some really cool things. Kiki got to mummify a chicken and help write a 20 minute opera about the revolutionary war.

      Edited at 2011-04-01 03:06 am (UTC)
      • (Anonymous)
        Yes, this is the ALL program, further north. I am nervous because I will have a month old baby when school starts next fall, and it will be a huge job for me to care for the baby, keep everything going as well as possible, and also help my son with the transition to the class. We'll muddle through somehow though.
  • (Anonymous)
    I didn't know you grew up in California. I was also in the GATE program for a year in middle school, and I remember that it seemed tedious. It felt like they just wanted me to work harder, not smarter.

    Not entirely by coincidence, this is also when my lifelong (losing) battle with apathy started. So while I didn't stick with the program, I also don't especially recommend the path I've taken.

    Regardless of the educational value of the programs themselves, one thing of considerable note in my experience is the change in peer groups and the resulting affect on socialization. Even if the teachers gave me nothing interesting to think about, it was nice to be around other kids I could relate to and who tended to be better behaved in general. I made some good friends that year, and we stayed close for a long time afterward.
    • You're right. The social aspect really matters. One of the reasons Kiki had a hard time is that she doesn't enjoy being around the straight A, grade focused kids. She much prefers the smart art room crowd. We figured that out in junior high.
  • The problem with that narrative is that it only sets a high bar without showing the kids how to reach it. If they don’t hit it on the first try, it feels hopeless to them.

    This reminds me of something velvetpage, a Canadian teacher, was writing about some weeks ago: that kids who are told they are smart give up sooner, because they'd rather be regarded as lazy than risk being thought of as stupid. :/
    • Exactly. A few years ago I read an article which cited a study that demonstrated the same thing.
Powered by LiveJournal.com